Accreditation Criteria
- Home
- Accreditation Criteria
Accreditation Criteria
Clear standards for course design, delivery, and assessment.
Accreditation Process
A 5-step review from application to certification.
Audit Tools
Templates and checklists to support compliance and quality.
why Us
Transparent Accreditation Process
At Educating Excellence, we are committed to full transparency. All accreditation criteria, process steps, and required documentation are clearly outlined and made accessible to applicants throughout the entire accreditation journey.
Our Values
Universal Accreditation Criteria
Learning Design
Sub-Area
Criteria
Evidence Required
Audit Indicators
Curriculum Coherence
Each course must define clear learning objectives aligned with content and assessment
- Course syllabus with learning outcomes
- Learning outcome matrix
- Min. 4 SMART learning outcomes per course
- Clear mapping of outcome → module → assessment
Pedagogical Logic
Curriculum must be modular and build progressively
- Module outline
- Visual curriculum map
- Min. 3 modules
- Evidence of progression (intro → intermediate → advanced)
Inclusivity & Accessibility
Course design must support neurodiverse and disadvantaged learners
- Accessibility checklist (e.g., WCAG 2.1 AA)
- Adaptation policy
- Min. 2 accommodations available (e.g., alternative formats)
- Accessible materials provided
Technology-Enhanced Learning
Technology must add value to pedagogy
- List of tools & purpose
- Screenshots or recordings
- At least 2 learner interaction tools (polls, LMS forums, breakout rooms) used per course
Sub-Area
Curriculum Coherence
Criteria
Each course must define clear learning objectives aligned with content and assessment
Evidence Required
- Course syllabus with learning outcomes
- Learning outcome matrix
Audit Indicators
- Min. 4 SMART learning outcomes per course
- Clear mapping of outcome → module → assessment
Sub-Area
Pedagogical Logic
Criteria
Curriculum must be modular and build progressively
Evidence Required
- Module outline
- Visual curriculum map
Audit Indicators
- Min. 3 modules
- Evidence of progression (intro → intermediate → advanced)
Sub-Area
Inclusivity & Accessibility
Criteria
Course design must support neurodiverse and disadvantaged learners
Evidence Required
- Accessibility checklist (e.g., WCAG 2.1 AA)
- Adaptation policy
Audit Indicators
- Min. 2 accommodations available (e.g., alternative formats)
- Accessible materials provided
Sub-Area
Technology-Enhanced Learning
Criteria
Technology must add value to pedagogy
Evidence Required
- List of tools & purpose
- Screenshots or recordings
Audit Indicators
- At least 2 learner interaction tools (polls, LMS forums, breakout rooms) used per course
Our Values
Universal Accreditation Criteria
Delivery
Sub-Area
Criteria
Evidence Required
Audit Indicators
Trainer Qualifications
All instructors must meet academic and teaching requirements
- CVs + Diplomas
- Teaching certificates or CPD proof
- Subject-matter degree: min EQF Level 6
- 2+ years teaching or training experience
Methodology
Active learning methods must be systematically used
- Sample lesson plan
- Session recording
- At least 3 active techniques per course (case study, role play, Q&A)
Learner Engagement
Learners must be continuously engaged and supported
- Learner journey plan
- Support staff list
- Dedicated contact person named
- Response time policy (<48h) published
Digital Standards
Online delivery must meet interactivity and reliability standards
- LMS screenshots
- Attendance or interaction reports
- Dropout rate < 20%
- Participant activity in > 60% of sessions
Sub-Area
Trainer Qualifications
Criteria
All instructors must meet academic and teaching requirements
Evidence Required
- CVs + Diplomas
- Teaching certificates or CPD proof
Audit Indicators
- Subject-matter degree: min EQF Level 6
- 2+ years teaching or training experience
Sub-Area
Methodology
Criteria
Active learning methods must be systematically used
Evidence Required
- Sample lesson plan
- Session recording
Audit Indicators
- At least 3 active techniques per course (case study, role play, Q&A)
Sub-Area
Learner Engagement
Criteria
Learners must be continuously engaged and supported
Evidence Required
- Sample lesson plan
- Session recording
Audit Indicators
- Dedicated contact person named
- Response time policy (<48h) published
Sub-Area
Digital Standards
Criteria
Online delivery must meet interactivity and reliability standards
Evidence Required
- LMS screenshots
- Attendance or interaction reports
Audit Indicators
- Dropout rate < 20%
- Participant activity in > 60% of sessions
Our Values
Universal Accreditation Criteria
Learning Outcomes & Assessment
Sub-Area
Criteria
Evidence Required
Audit Indicators
Assessment Alignment
Assessments must evaluate what is taught
- Assessment blueprint
- Example assessment
- One summative and one formative assessment per course
- Outcome-assessment mapping
Outcome Achievement
Learner performance must be documented
- Learner performance records
- Pre-/post-test samples
- 70% learners meet stated learning outcomes
Certification Transparency
Certification process must be fair and documented
- Grading policy
- Certificate template
- Pass/fail criteria published
- Audit log of certificate issuance
Feedback Integration
Learner feedback must be collected and used
- Feedback forms (min. 5 questions)
- Improvement log
- 70% learner satisfaction
- Documented updates based on feedback
Sub-Area
Assessment Alignment
Criteria
Assessments must evaluate what is taught
Evidence Required
- Assessment blueprint
- Example assessment
Audit Indicators
- One summative and one formative assessment per course
- Outcome-assessment mapping
Sub-Area
Outcome Achievement
Criteria
Learner performance must be documented
Evidence Required
- Learner performance records
- Pre-/post-test samples
Audit Indicators
- 70% learners meet stated learning outcomes
Sub-Area
Certification Transparency
Criteria
Certification process must be fair and documented
Evidence Required
- Grading policy
- Certificate template
Audit Indicators
- Pass/fail criteria published
- Audit log of certificate issuance
Sub-Area
Feedback Integration
Criteria
Learner feedback must be collected and used
Evidence Required
- Feedback forms (min. 5 questions)
- Improvement log
Audit Indicators
- 70% learner satisfaction
- Documented updates based on feedback
Our Values
Universal Accreditation Criteria
Learning Outcomes & Assessment
Sub-Area
Criteria
Evidence Required
Audit Indicators
Assessment Alignment
Assessments must evaluate what is taught
- Assessment blueprint
- Example assessment
- One summative and one formative assessment per course
- Outcome-assessment mapping
Outcome Achievement
Learner performance must be documented
- Learner performance records
- Pre-/post-test samples
- 70% learners meet stated learning outcomes
Certification Transparency
Certification process must be fair and documented
- Grading policy
- Certificate template
- Pass/fail criteria published
- Audit log of certificate issuance
Feedback Integration
Learner feedback must be collected and used
- Feedback forms (min. 5 questions)
- Improvement log
- 70% learner satisfaction
- Documented updates based on feedback
Sub-Area
Assessment Alignment
Criteria
Assessments must evaluate what is taught
Evidence Required
- Assessment blueprint
- Example assessment
Audit Indicators
- One summative and one formative assessment per course
- Outcome-assessment mapping
Sub-Area
Outcome Achievement
Criteria
Learner performance must be documented
Evidence Required
- Learner performance records
- Pre-/post-test samples
Audit Indicators
- 70% learners meet stated learning outcomes
Sub-Area
Certification Transparency
Criteria
Certification process must be fair and documented
Evidence Required
- Grading policy
- Certificate template
Audit Indicators
- Pass/fail criteria published
- Audit log of certificate issuance
Sub-Area
Feedback Integration
Criteria
Learner feedback must be collected and used
Evidence Required
- Feedback forms (min. 5 questions)
- Improvement log
Audit Indicators
- 70% learner satisfaction
- Documented updates based on feedback
Our Values
Accreditation Process
Stage
Description
Deliverables
Application
Institution submits application & required documents
- Institution submits application & required documents
- Course descriptions
- Trainer CVs
Pre-Audit Screening
EE performs document and eligibility review
- Compliance checklist
- Initial feedback report
Audit (on-site or virtual)
Structured review of practices, systems, and delivery
- Audit plan
- Interviews with trainers and QA staff
- Evidence samples collected
Feedback & Correction Loop
EE issues a findings report; provider may respond
- Corrective action plan (CAP)
- Supporting documents
Certification Decision
Final review panel awards (or denies) accreditation
- Accreditation decision letter
- Certificate with expiry date (2–3 years)
Stage
Application
Description
Institution submits application & required documents
Deliverables
- Institution submits application & required documents
- Course descriptions
- Trainer CVs
Stage
Pre-Audit Screening
Description
EE performs document and eligibility review
Deliverables
- Compliance checklist
- Initial feedback report
Stage
Audit (on-site or virtual)
Description
Structured review of practices, systems, and delivery
Deliverables
- Audit plan
- Interviews with trainers and QA staff
- Evidence samples collected
Stage
Feedback & Correction Loop
Description
EE issues a findings report; provider may respond
Deliverables
- Corrective action plan (CAP)
- Supporting documents
Stage
Certification Decision
Description
Final review panel awards (or denies) accreditation
Deliverables
- Accreditation decision letter
- Certificate with expiry date (2–3 years)
Our Values
Audit Tools & Self-Assessment Templates
Tool
Purpose
Key Features
Self-Assessment Template (Excel)
Helps providers check readiness
- All 3 categories (Design, Delivery, Outcomes)
- Yes/No with space for evidence
- Color-coded compliance levels
Audit Checklist (PDF)
Used by EE auditors to standardize evaluations
- 30+ measurable indicators
- Space for notes and scores
- Traffic-light system
Trainer File Template
Ensures all trainer qualifications are standardized
- Required: CV, degree, certificate, 2 references
Learner Feedback Template
For providers to gather structured feedback
- 5-point Likert scale
- Optional open feedback section
- Anonymous format (PDF or Google Form)
Tool
Self-Assessment Template (Excel)
Purpose
Helps providers check readiness
Key Features
- All 3 categories (Design, Delivery, Outcomes)
- Yes/No with space for evidence
- Color-coded compliance levels
Tool
Audit Checklist (PDF)
Purpose
Used by EE auditors to standardize evaluations
Key Features
- 30+ measurable indicators
- Space for notes and scores
- Traffic-light system
Tool
Trainer File Template
Purpose
Ensures all trainer qualifications are standardized
Key Features
- Required: CV, degree, certificate, 2 references
Tool
Learner Feedback Template
Purpose
For providers to gather structured feedback
Key Features
- 5-point Likert scale
- Optional open feedback section
- Anonymous format (PDF or Google Form)
